Category: Meanderings

  • Love is Blind … Yes or No?

    Love is Blind … Yes or No?

    I’ve heard the phrase, “Love is blind,” ever since I was a child. For the novel I’m currently writing, I’m exploring the concept because one of my characters believes that if you really love someone, you’ll do anything for that person.

    When I began crafting my characters and plot, I conducted research on the topic. As always, my research had me recognizing some facts about myself … and feeling much better about some of the dumber relationship mistakes I’ve made.

    So, here’s what a handful of scientists and mental health professionals have to say about whether love is blind.

    It’s All About Brain Chemistry

    When we fall in love (or in lust), our bodies go nuts. Especially our brains. Hormones and brain chemicals conspire to interfere with our common sense. They camouflage what really exists and sometimes prompt us to behave in ways we wouldn’t in the absence of all that romance (or lust).

    Thomas Sherman, a noted biochemist and professor at Georgetown University, has said that romantic love subdues the “neural activity associated with critical social assessment of others.” In other words, love makes us believe our lovers are more virtuous and less weak than other people might believe. Love makes us view our lovers through the lens of positivity rather than negativity.

    And it’s not that we twist negative reality or refuse to see weaknesses. It’s simply that when we see them, we don’t think they’re meaningful. I don’t remember who used the phrase but somewhere in my research one of the authors explained the phenomenon as us wearing rose-colored glasses during the early stages of love instead of magnifying glasses.

    A great example involves how we actually see our lovers. How our minds process the tangibles (cognition) and how reach final conclusions (evaluation). Let’s say Jane is greatly attracted to and loves her boyfriend John. When asked to “rate” his handsomeness in both appearance and attractiveness, she says:

    • His appearance, on a scale of 1 to 10, is a 6
    • His attractiveness, on a scale of 1 to 5, is a 4

    Because Jane loves John more for his intelligence and sense of humor than his looks, she rates him higher than an objective observer would. Others, those who like but are not in love with John, would rate him a 3 or 4 in appearance and 2 in attractiveness.

    Our brains actually shut down their logic receptors when we’re in love, which allows us to focus more on our lovers’ positive qualities than on their negative characteristics. In effect, we’re anesthetized to the behaviors that will drive us nuts later on in the relationship.

    Brain Chemicals Behind the “Love is Blind” Phenomenon

    Brain chemicals affect lust, attraction, and attachment. We’ve all felt lust. It’s our estrogen and testosterone that get that ball rolling.

    Attraction is all about enthusiasm, energy, craving and—sometimes—obsession. Three brain chemicals are responsible for these responses:

    • Dopamine regulates our reward centers, motivation, sense of novelty, and directs our goals.
    • Norepinephrine increases our energy, decreases our appetite, races our hearts, and reduces our need for sleep.
    • Serotonin regulates our mood, sleep, appetite, and cognitive functions. It has a tendency to depress and decrease and is responsible for love-related obsession.

    Scientists and psychologists say that, on average, commitment becomes very important in true love relationships about four years in. Commitment can include monogamy, cohabitation, and/or marriage. At this time, the level of dopamine in the brain drops and is replaced by either oxytocin (in women) or vasopressin (in men).

    • Oxytocin is released during childbirth and breastfeeding. It supports the mother-child bonding, pair bonding, and empathy in women.
    • Vasopressin makes a male want to bond with a mate and is responsible for territorial aggression. It’s what makes many men so protective of their girlfriends, wives, and families. However, in most males who are not interested in or capable of pair bonding, it’s been found they have lower than normal levels of vasopressin.

    Other Factors that Support the Love is Blind Concept

    Sherman has also said that “love begins as a stressor then becomes a buffer against the stress.” Love activates the brain’s reward centers. Cortisol increases one’s awareness which, in turn, offsets the stress response. And, of course, dopamine heightens pleasure.

    We’ve all heard the phrases, “love at first sight,” “the One,” and the “halo effect.” Pesky brain chemicals are the culprits here, as well. Love at first sight is most likely a combination of lust/physical attraction and projection—seeing in others what we’re feeling/thinking ourselves. When we’re looking for our soulmate, that’s who we think we’re seeing in this gorgeous, wonderful person. Voilá: The One. The halo effect, what my mother used to call my rose-colored glasses, is believing someone is wonderful simply because we find them attractive. (Don’t we expect the murderer to be ugly and the leading man to be gorgeous?)

    A Final Word

    In short, it’s biology–nature’s attempt to propagate the species–that set our hormones and brain chemicals in motion when we fall in lust. The emotions of true love are an entirely different matter. Few creatures in the wild mate for life.

    It’s shared experiences that help build love after the brain chemicals fade. And keep in mind: communication and communication styles can either make or break a relationship. The signs of true love and a healthy romantic relationship include:

    • Deep emotional intimacy
    • Trust
    • Mutual support and respect
    • Self-awareness
    • Choosing to love the entire, flawed person
    • A balance between individuality and togetherness
    • Belief that love is a journey and not a destination

    Resources

    Here are links to a couple of articles to get you thinking:

    When I consider the above list, I now know why those past relationships of mine didn’t work. What are your thoughts?

  • Social Media isn’t Social Anymore

    Social Media isn’t Social Anymore

    I don’t know about you, but when I signed up for my first social media account (Linked In), it was at the suggestion of my daughter. As a recruiter, she suggested I get my name out there and network with other business professionals. Not only could I keep up with business associates all across the country, she informed me, I’d be able to solicit writing contracts. Sounded like a plan…

    How I Used to View Social Media

    Linked In has always been a great resource. Professionally, many of the initial contacts past clients made with me were a result of viewing my Linked In profile. Currently, students attending my webinars and reading my books reach out to me via the site.

    Of course, there’s always the guys purporting to be high-ranking members of the military or physicians who are blown away by my beauty. My nearly 70-year-old, chubby, gray-haired beauty. These guys invariably apologize for seeking a personal relationship on a business site. Then again, given my beauty…

    After Linked In, I gravitated to Facebook to keep in touch with my family on the east coast when I lived in Montana. Then, when I moved back east, I created a business Facebook page and a Twitter (now X) page to keep in touch with business associates in the west.

    More recently, I created an Instagram profile so I could follow artists and watch their watercolor painting reels. (I started painting a year ago and am fascinated by how artists handle their water, paint, and brushes.)

    Here’s the thing: I joined each social media site for a specfic purpose. And that purpose was being social. Social as in keeping up with what’s happening in the lives of my family, friends, and business associates who aren’t within going-out-to-dinner distance.

    How I View Social Media Now

    When I log into my accounts now, I’m still able to engage in all the same social interactions I’ve always enjoyed. Unfortunately, my feeds and timelines have become infested with an unpleasant amount of UNsocial and ANTIsocial commentary.

    It’s probably not as much, quantity-wise, as it seems. And it’s probably just the negativity bias at work that’s upsetting me. But it still gets me down. Actually, it’s starting to make me angry.

    Not because I have a problem with people voicing their opinions. After all, I’m a writer and a 100% proponent of free speech. I believe people should be able to say whatever they want, whether it’s verbally or in writing.

    What I have a problem with is people verbalizing their opinions everywhere, regardless of the forum, 24 hours a day–without exercising common sense or consideration for others.

    I don’t want to see posts about politics, religion, abused animals, murdered women, and all kinds of negative things when I visit my social media. That stuff isn’t exactly social.

    Why can’t we have networks dedicated to conversation about ONLY politics? Or ONLY religion? Or ONLY the awful, nasty, crap that’s going on in the world? And when I want to read about that stuff, I can visit those sites? And when I want to chat with my grandkids, or watch dog videos, or keep up with my buddies in Missoula I can do JUST those things?

    Sure, I can filter what I see in my feeds and timelines. And I’ve done that. However, the fact that I’ve snoozed for 30 days the feeds of nearly one-third of my Facebook friends troubles me. And has prompted me to reconsider logging in. Maybe even cancelling my accounts.

    News, Opinion, and Social media

    Once upon a time, when I watched the news on TV or read a newspaper I believed I was watching individuals report what had happened, without bias. If bias existed (and let’s face it, it had to at some level–reporters are humans), it was frowned upon, kept to a minimum, or we didn’t know about it.

    Now, wherever we go, we’re bombarded with other people’s opinions and their biases. And often, these judgments are stated as facts. An opinion is a perspective or a judgment. A fact is something that exists. It’s real, it doesn’t just exist in someone’s mind.

    Opinions aren’t facts!

    We need to remember this.

    We should also respect the fact that not everyone cares to hear our opinions. Just because another person doesn’t share our opinion, it doesn’t automatically make that person wrong, bad, stupid, or the enemy. I suspect that if you were to share all your opinions with any one person and in exchange receive all that person’s opinions, you’d find far more you agree with than you disagree with.

    Regardless, different opinions don’t automatically make one of them right and the other wrong. Or one good and the other bad.

    If I were dating again (and let’s hope that never happens), I’d act on several biases I have. One with respect to hair color and another with repsect to certain recreational activities. Are they fair? No. Am I sharing them with you now or would I in the future tell a guy Hell, no! I won’t date you because of your disgusting X hair color or awful preference to XX in your spare time!? No, I am not and would not. Why? Because I care about your feelings and those of the (fictional) guy with the X hair and fondness for XX.

    I guess I’m concerned with what seems to be some people’s total lack of empathy for those whose opinions differ from their own.

    What’s your take on social media?

    How do you feel about social media? Is it doing what you want it to do? Are you still finding it “social?” I’m not. I’m seriously considering throwing in my towel.

    I’m so very disappointed with people I used to admire. My disappointment isn’t with their views. It’s with their intolerance. It’s with people from all walks of life, with all kinds of opinions on all sides of every issue, turning nasty, intolerant, and downright abusive.

    These people have a right to say whatever they want, whenever they want, and wherever they want. I get it. I just wish they were more considerate.

    Perhaps sharing my perspective will help them view their own from a different angle…

  • Do Crystals Really have healing energy?

    Do Crystals Really have healing energy?

    If you conduct research online, you see conflicting opinions about the beneficial effects of crystals, or crystal healing. Scientists pooh-pooh their ability to cure or alleviate stress and medical conditions. Others swear by their healing properties.

    What’s your go-to when you’re upset? Do you grab a snack? Smoke a cigarette? Go for a run? Or do you reach for a rock, or a piece of glass, or a favorite necklace, bracelet, or ring?

    Crystal Energy

    No matter what you do when you’re upset, you DO something. And that involves energy. The energy of digesting, breathing smoke into your lungs, or getting those muscles moving. The energy of going inward, joining your mind and body through touch.

    Now, if you know me (or even got a good look at me), you know I’m a fan of eating and not so much of a fan when it comes to spending time exercising. Fortunately, I’ve never smoked. And I’m always reaching for that crystal—whether it’s a stone I can pocket, hold in my hand, or wear as jewelry.

    I have crystals scattered all around my house. Tumbled stones in glass dishes and seashells. Palm stones, worry stones, and raw/untreated pieces on my desk and night table. Towers and free forms on my bookshelves. I feel their energy and, because they often calm me, I feel “crystal healing.”

    When my grandson was about seven years old, he discovered the crystals in my living room. He asked if he could pick his favorite stone in each of the glass bowls. See the image of the stones in the heart-shaped dish? Those are the stones he chose … and they’re all aventurine, just different colors. When I asked him why he picked those stones he shrugged. “I just like them, Grammy.”

    Blue, green, yellow, and orange aventurine

    Favorite crystals

    What crystals, rocks, or stones do you “just like?” I’m always drawn to the jaspers and agates. I also have an affinity for some types of quartz. Rose quartz and amethyst are the most popular, but their energy seldom resonates with me. I prefer Herkimer, clear, and smoky quartz, along with citrine.

    The energy in some crystals is too strong for me. I feel weird when I wear them. I think malachite is one of the most beautiful crystals out there regardless of whether it’s the deep, dark green of a natural untreated stone, or the multicolored stripes of a tumbled stone. Unfortunately, when I wear it I get a headache.

    I prefer the red and brown and green jaspers; I find them calming and grounding when I’m stressed. And I haven’t found an agate I don’t like. My favorites are moss agate and Montana agate. I sleep better when I wear moss agate and aventurine bracelets on my left wrist. Normally, I don’t remember my dreams; but when I wear Montana agate to bed, I do.

    Your take

    What’s your take on crystals and the energy they emit? Do you have a favorite crystal?

     

  • Are You, or Someone You Know, a HSP (Highly Sensitive Person)?

    Are You, or Someone You Know, a HSP (Highly Sensitive Person)?

    Are you a HSP? Does any of this sound like you, or someone you know?

    • Do any of the following regularly bother or overwhelm you: loud noises, bright lights, clothing with rough textures, crowds?
    • Do you notice details other people seem to miss?
    • Do you respond emotionally to music, art, and/or nature?
    • Can other people’s moods make you happy, sad, angry, etc.?
    • Are you a deep thinker?
    • Do you prefer small, or one-on-one, gatherings to large social events?
    • Do you have a low tolerance for pain, caffeine, and/or medication?
    • Can movies and books make you cry?
    • Would you prefer to have a deep, intimate conversation instead of engaging in small talk?
    • Has a family member or loved one referred to you as “too sensitive?”
    Are you a HSP?

    I first heard the term highly sensitive person in the late 1990s when my ex-husband presented me with the book written by Elaine Aron, The Highly Sensitive Person. At the time, her research was viewed as controversial and, in the intervening years, is accepted as scientifically accurate. She’s also written several follow up books (https://hsperson.com/books/).

    Here are a few details.

    (At the end of the post, I’ll provide more links if you want to investigate more thoroughly.)

    • HSPs represent about 15-20% of the population.
    • This trait is present in more than 100 different animals. Scientists believe it may be associated with the ability to adapt and survive.
    • HSPs process their thoughts and emotions more deeply than others do. During clinical research, parts of their brain actually respond differently.
    • Because of this deep processing, HSPs tend to become easily overwhelmed by external stimulus (i.e., sounds, smells, bright light, other people’s emotions).

    Are you a HSP? Here’s Elaine Aron’s self-test, if you’re interested: https://hsperson.com/test/highly-sensitive-test/.

    FYI, of a possible 126, I scored 112, which represents 6.2 on a scale of 7. Anything over a 5 indicates a person is probably highly sensitive. Of course, there are different kinds of sensitivity; I scored higher in some areas than others. These areas are:

    • Overstimulation
    • Sensitivity to positive experiences
    • Social sensitivity
    • Depth of processing
    • Emotional reactivity
    • Sensitivity to details

    What I found interesting about the different scores in the preceding 6 areas, is that I was spot on when it came to recognizing in what areas I’m most sensitive.

    So, what do you think? Are YOU an HSP? Care to share your thoughts?

     

  • What’s Your Favorite Crystal/Gemstone?

    What’s Your Favorite Crystal/Gemstone?

    What’s your favorite crystal or type of gemstone?

    Have you ever pocketed stones when beachcombing? What color or type of rocks do you prefer? For example, I know a woman who only gathers pure white stones. How about jewelry–what’s your favorite crystal or gemstone?

    My interest in crystals started a few years ago when I bought a bracelet with pretty stones in it. The packaging included a card that said the stone had certain properties encouraging serenity and stress relief. And sure enough, I felt calmer when I wore it. That’s probably why I chose it in the first place.

    We all have favorite colors, textures, and moods. As I studied more about the healing properties of crystals, I realized that I’d had an affinity for them for about 20 years—without even realizing it!

    When I lived in Montana, a client of mine made handcrafted jewelry. She allowed me to choose the beads I liked and made several (like a dozen) necklaces and pairs of earrings. It wasn’t until recently that I realized ALL the beads I’d chosen then, except for one, were actually crystals (i.e., semi-precious stones) and crystals I have an affinity for now.

    To get this conversation started, let me know which group of stones YOU prefer from the image at the right:

    1: Three dark green stones (all different stones)

    2: Three different colored stones with designs (different categories of same stone)

    3: Two orangey-red stones (same stone)

    4: Five different colored stones with designs (different categories of same stone)

    5: Three blue stones (two different stones)

    6: Two swirly-patterned stones (same stone)

    7: Three stones—pink, clear, purple/white (three different categories of same type of stone)

    Feel free to ask any questions and I’ll share what knowledge and insights I have. FYI, if I receive a lot of similar questions, I’ll be happy to create a blog post addressing specific topics.

    P.S. Extra points if you can guess which of these stones actually makes the back of my head tingle when I hold it in my hand.

    Here are some websites where you can learn more: